World Of Tanks Matchmaking Table World of tanks matchmaking table

World Of Tanks Matchmaking Table 8.9

world of tanks matchmaking 8.6

But to say the IS-6 gun handling is nice is straight up wrong. The SP and IS6 are still viable when you fire nothing but prem. So I was pretty excited last week as I finally got through the 55k grind to get a Chaffee. Actually 2 times I've gotten into all tier 5 games as a chaffee. Mopar SL 2 Posted 13 March - With a dispersion of 0. I get top tier quite a bit when I play my T solo.

Find the good stuff

Next time, I'll be at the top, random battle, one level battle, Ensk. Community Forum Software by IP. Next time, I'll be at the bottom too, encounter battle, Mines. And those values aren't good either, even compared to other big russian guns. However, this paper will not go in depth with the matchmaker itself, as that is only the stage in which the preferential matchmaking tanks compete in. I started playing in The armor on the tank, while troll to tier 7 and 6, is no match against most tier 8 and no tier 9.

The matchmaker takes the corresponding line from the table below and sees that the IS has battle tiers from 7 till 9. Randomly is the tier for battle selected. In our example let it be 8 from 7 to 9 incl. The matchmaker takes tanks from queue, which can participate in tier 8 battles see column number 8 in the table and puts them in 2 teams. In our battle we can face Tiger II and for example M6 both can participate in tier 8 battles.

There are 12 battle tiers. In the tier 12 battles you will have only tanks from 10 tier and some light scouts from lower tiers.

Some players are confusing battle tiers with tank tiers. This values must not be the same. The matchmaker resolves battle tier on the basis of table below. Most tier 8 and most definitely tier 9 will punch holes in the Super Pershing. The IS-6 too trades in a variety of, more or less, prominent stats. The Canon of the IS-6 has the worst stats of all its competitors. With a dispersion of 0. It lacks accuracy, but more importantly it lacks penetration.

The IS-6 is equipped with a mm gun with mm penetration, with premium. This tank struggles against practically everything it faces even more so against higher tier opponents. Surely the IS-6 has armor, indeed it does.

The armor of the IS-6 can be very annoying to penetrate — for tier 7, and sometimes tier 8. Tier 9 will have no problems when facing the IS The tier 8 IS-6 is therefor stranded in a strange place: Not being able to use its armor properly together with gun stats that indicates close quarters combat. However, even up close the IS-6 will very often find that even lower plates can be a struggle to penetrate with its tier 7 gun. Both tanks suffer from meeting opponents that is much better in all aspects — that is the trade of a pref.

The problem is that these pref. They are meant to be top tier where they can make up for their flaws. The new MM is probably not going to disappear. However, something needs to be done with these Pref. They need to be competitive against its own tier and tier 9, as these are the tiers that they face the most.

That would on the other hand make them way too OP against the tier they always were meant to face — tier 7. Perhaps removing their pref. However, these tanks are not competitive when they face their own or higher tiers. Both options are viable. Keep in mind that the first one, removing pref MM status would balance more the tank.

Not just a fact of penetration, IS6 can be joked in many ways. So, the super MM would mitigate a bit the situation, not solving at all. SuperPershing, is interesting the proposal of a heavy armoured tank as medium, ok, but to face t9 and t10 is important to give better gun.

IS6 need a total different gun. Even with IS3 gun Why dont we consider to give a different gun? I'd say the first one. Albeit the second would make them very strong. The first one just seems more balanced. I love it the way it is. The reason I now have to carry some HE on some pref tanks.

Meeting a Type 4 in an IS-6 is a fucking joke. I only had 4 HE shells and was sniping the cupola for 30 damage.. I completely misplayed that match and shouldn't have been where I was, but as a brawling heavy with gold pen HE is going to be better than not shooting the tank if you have absolutely no other option.

Do you mean one of the russian tier 7 heavies? Cuz the T20 has iirc gold pen, and same for the T You can't reliably pen the cupola with pen, especially on flat ground look up at the cupola.

You need to shoot the drivers hatch, it's weaker, and can be penned when front on with average rolls. Though really you're always best off re-positioning when possible against that tank in a tier 7. You can't reliably pen the hatch with the T20 on level ground using prem. You would require at very minimum a completely un-angled shot with even height and at very least an average pen roll.

I mean realistically you just never shoot the front of a Type 4 in almost every T7 medium. Met one in my IS-6 on console. Fortunately he was a dumbass and I could park next to him and farm: Pref MM tanks have always intentionally been worse than normal tech tree tanks, the problem is that normal tech tier 8's were power crept upwards, tier 8 MM made worse in general doomed to be farmed horribly by tier 10's and 9's , and normal tier 7's were left alone.

There can't be an endless cycle of buffing and buffing, or you get to the situation we're in now where the Chieftain and MBT70 and historically accurate seriously, no bias IS-7 make sense to have in the game as-is, which is ridiculous, there's a reason tanks like Maus and IS-4 went extinct IRL and those tanks are that reason.

Tier 10s or any tier for that matter should never be balanced around fighting lower tiers. They should be balanced towards fighting their own tier. However, as I originally wrote, the opposition has become tougher and the risk of becoming low tier has become higher.

That leaves many of the pref. You should make a different topic for that, because every tier is balanced around the whole spread. Even the VK , as "balanced" as it is.

So, what do you propose we nerf to indirectly buff pref MM tanks? Just the tier 8 overperformers? And what will they both do when they see tier 9's? I absolutely do NOT want pref matchmaking to get removed. I don't care if they buff the tanks a ton, the whole reason I play preferential matchmaking tanks like my T is I remember when an IS-6 commanded respect from the opposition, even when it was a less than skilled player in it.

For all the newbies it had the same sort of rep the Defender has now, i. It was my first tier 8 premium and while I had to put it away for a while as I learned to play properly at that tier I often enjoyed playing it once I was used to it. I haven't played it in ages, it's no longer a threat to tier 8 tanks, it's a joke to tier 9s. Shoulder, drive wheel, drivers hatch, turret side, cupola, so many choices where to pen it. A tier 8 Light would not be threatened by it, a lot of tier 8 heavies would have no trouble bouncing it, a tier 9 heavy would simply drive over it.

I miss the IS-6 of old even if it hasn't really changed. In today's world of premium heavies it simply became a forgotten tank, a relic of a forgotten era. Even when I platoon with a non pref MM tank and get a tier 10 game I don't think it is so bad. All you have to do is go back and look at the difference in win rate from two years ago. I made a post including the win rate of some of these tanks so I have the data. If that's not all the proof you need, then I don't know what to tell you.

They went from mildly overpowered, to absolutely awful. This is data that Wargaming has access to on their back end, so I'm sure they know about how bad they are. I'm not sure what they're waiting on. Yeah, in my T I always try to avoid tier 9s, since I will struggle to pen them. And the T is one of the tanks that does better than most other pref MM premiums.

They really need to fix this, played 10 games last night and only had 1 where I was top tier, the rest was either full tier 8 or and even a few games. No, not that that stopped me from having good games, had 2 4K damage games and 1 5k damage game since my play style does not really rely on fighting tanks frontally.

I personally think the IS-6 is fine how it is, though a bit power-creeped. The preferential matchmaking benefit being worse now is really the root of its problems. On paper it's the same, but in practice with the current system it would mean you'd never be bottom tier, you'd be top tier more often, and you'd only ever see 3 tier 9s in a single match.

And they should also count them as their lower tier for the sake of platoons, so it doesn't prevent mixing pz M10 with tier 6s, etc It seems I am the only one who feels preferential match making is actually better now. Granted power creep is real, can't argue against new tanks and lines being better than old ones. But I just don't see how the new match maker is making it any worse. I am top tier often enough, which now can mean being 1 of only 6 tier 8s in the entire match.

The IS-6 isn't powerful against heavies of its own tier. Try facing a defender or a patriot. You need gold to even have a chance at penning lower plate "weak spots". I love my IS-6 but it needs a buff to be competitive at all. I often lose money with the IS-6 without a premium account. The gun without premium would rather easily bounce off of the T32's hull unless front on.

I think people are just starting to see the tank as what I've always seen it as, which is a low tier bully. Maybe it's an IS-6 problem, I dont own one. I think the pref MM tanks still have a big advantage over regular t8's due to how crappy the MM is. In the end every single t8 tank got screwed over by the MM changes in return for even better matchups for t9 and t That is because most tier 8, for instance, can fight tier 9 as the gap isn't huge.

However the gap between tier 8 and 10 is huge. The same goes for tier 6 and 8 etc. The best thing they have is the health pool they face. It is a bit hard to tell IS-6 in this way, though. For we players, such difference could only be more huge, it's harder to carry in tier10 than tier9 obviously.

IS6 is not bad at all. The gun handling is very nice, especially its russian gun. It only lacks pen. Compare it to tanks with good gun handling and everything just looks awful. Terrible aim time, accuracy looks like a derp gun, poor dispersion values, shit gun depression

Iamges: world of tanks matchmaking 8.6

world of tanks matchmaking 8.6

World of tanks matchmaking table 8 6. Please take this into account when forming platoons. Unless they changed the patch notes I will find the exact words for every single patch starting from 8.

world of tanks matchmaking 8.6

It was my first tier 8 premium and while I had to put it away for a while as I learned to play properly at that tier I often enjoyed playing it once I was used to it. And the thing is, it should equal itself out, you should get an equal proportion of games where your team has better players and conversely where it has worse. I personally think the IS-6 is fine how it is, though a bit power-creeped.

world of tanks matchmaking 8.6

Stickies are used for news and important content, but you can book a sticky post in advance by messaging the moderators. The Scrapyard World of tanks 8. PC world can help predict. I'm not sure what they're waiting on. The problem is that these pref.