I would agree with most if this. Contact Us Archive Top. Reply Share this post.
Top Scoring Stories
And the SU would have Then get the matchmaker to make sure that the sum of the points across each team is about the same, and that the average of the points is the closest for each team as well again eliminating situation where you have 14 crap tanks and one really OP one. A point by point explaination of why you think he is wrong would be much better than just posting a blanket condemnation of his post. Of course, patch 1. Notify me of new comments via email. And even if it did make battles harder, again, it would add a sense of realism.
It really astonishes me how easy these things are. And in the worst case scenario, if you're incapable of writing code, you can always have a human matchmaker. A human that knows the game inside out and can therefore make optimised teams for fair play. Why does one team get one artillery and the other one gets 3??? WG don't even try sometimes. And even if it did make battles harder, again, it would add a sense of realism.
If one team has an SPG, and the other doesn't, it would be more like real life. And again, if the matchmaker was programmed with the most basic knowledge of what tanks are op and what aren't, it would be nice. For example, give each tank a score of points. Make it a hidden value, but a value nevertheless. For example, the Churchill GC would have And the SU would have Then get the matchmaker to make sure that the sum of the points across each team is about the same, and that the average of the points is the closest for each team as well again eliminating situation where you have 14 crap tanks and one really OP one.
If I can write such a program in Python when I'm bored surely so can Wargaming. But of course even if I get the whole community on my side, I will still not get any support or even an answer from WG. And that means profit. No other way to put it. No I do not think there is so much wrong with this, the poster is obviously pee'd off with the current state of MM, something I would second too.
A point by point explaination of why you think he is wrong would be much better than just posting a blanket condemnation of his post.
That's why a Rampanzer isn't scored as a tier 5 medium in the team total. It is scored as a tier 5 heavy or a tier 6 medium. So it has a higher value because it is expected to swing more battle for the team. It was included in the detailed breakdown of how MM works after it was, asked in battle heroes. I hope it helps JelliedPenny08, on 16 September - Plus it appears to be giving the Red team double of anything the Green team gets allocated.
On top of which if the Green team is lucky to get one artillery you can guarrantee the Red's have at least three. Just curious, what server are you playing on? I've never been in a match that has been that unbalanced while on the East server. I had gone back onto the Euro server because of a unscheduled server shut down. Lulled into a false sense of security by a couple reasonable games I then got hit by that example of really unbalanced MM. I think the Euro server works on the basis of one for the Green team and two for the Red team when doing the classes!
You realize folks "in the know" change it from gold to silver for the premium ammo, hence no profits for WG. Only tanks top tier, middle tier and then the rest low tier. Albapfalzd3, on 19 September - Community Forum Software by IP. Search Advanced Search section: View Source View history. This article requires additional modification. These differences are taken into account in tooltip boxes.
Pros and Cons Pros: Very fast and maneuverable Excellent tank for flanking and scouting Faster aim time than the regular Sherman mounting the identical gun Much improved armour over original M4 , combined with reduced chance of module damage. Very bad gun when you meet tier 7 opponents or heavily armored tanks Very inaccurate, albeit 0.
The initial request for an improved version of the Sherman was made as early as December A day after the infamous Pearl Harbor attack, Aberdeen was instructed to propose an improved Sherman version with better armor and mobility. Aberdeen complied and the proposal was submitted on The vehicle proposal had following characteristics: Sources and External Links. Hunnicutt — History of the American medium tank vol.
Iamges: improved matchmaking
Sweat Hog Swami 4 Posted 16 September - Given the amount of time this issue has existed where we were told Trollbane would fix this issue which it clearly didn't, and lack of response to that inquiry we kept saying it didnt work but no one would come out to acknowledge that we were right and that you folks would be working on a new solution a lot of time has passed and due to lack of communication or acknowledgement you folks have lost a lot of trust. The length of time it took for you folks to finally respond to what we have been trying to say the whole time that Trolbane doesn't work and that it needs to be moved server side.
Skip to content About Contact. I would agree with most if this. And if you think the game developers don't know what is an op Tier 8 and what isn't, you're wrong.
I would agree with most if this. You stand no chance. Search Advanced Search section: A point by point explaination of why you think he is wrong would be much better than just posting a blanket condemnation of his post. The M4 Improved matchmaking should be used as an aggressive flanker or defensive close-range matchmakinng. This article requires additional improved matchmaking.